Evaluation
|
|
(4) Distinguished |
(3) Commendable |
(2) Acceptable |
(1) Not Acceptable |
|
Organization & Content (40%)
|
· Well-developed introductory paragraph and thesis statement · Well-developed supporting paragraphs · Clear and insightful conclusion · Synthesizes ideas into a coherent whole, utilizing effective transitions · Easy to follow |
· Effective introductory paragraph and thesis statement · Effective supporting paragraphs · Summarizing conclusion · Synthesizes ideas well; has transitions · Rarely hard to follow |
· Introductory paragraph and thesis statement · Limited supporting paragraphs · Limited summarizing conclusion · Presents ideas in a logical sequence; may lack transitions · Sometimes difficult to follow |
· Inadequate or missing introductory paragraph and/or thesis statement · Inadequate or missing supporting paragraphs · Inadequate, missing, or illogical conclusion · Incoherent; unclear; jumps from topic to topic or rambles |
|
Research (30%)
|
· Exceptional research · Wide variety of credible sources that are current or up to date · Current, complete and extensive information |
· Thorough research · Some variety of sources that are current and generally credible · Recent and complete information |
· Adequate research · Similar types of sources which may or may not be current; generally credible · Recent, but limited information |
· Incomplete research · Sources are all of one type, and/or are out of date, and/or lacking credibility · Out of date ore very limited information · Paper is plagiarized |
|
Style (20%)
|
· Distinctive or unique voice and style · Style is appropriate to the topic and audience · Clearly and articulately written |
· Conventional voice and style · Style may be appropriate to the topic and audience · Coherently written |
· Predictable “textbook” style · Some awareness of audience · Logically written |
· No evidence of voice or style · Demonstrates little or no awareness of audience · May be incoherently or illogically written |
|
Conventions (10%)
|
· Extensive and effective use of terminology for the topic · Correct usage and use of complex mechanics · Considerable variation in sentence structure (length, simple/complex) |
· Appropriate use of terminology · Correct usage and mechanics · Some variation in sentence structure (length/type) |
· Limited use of terminology · Limited errors in usage and mechanics · Little variation in sentence structure (simple, but complete) |
· Terminology missing or used incorrectly · Frequent and distracting errors in usage and mechanics · Incomplete sentences or run-ons |