Evaluation
Team Evaluation
|
|
10 |
8 |
6 |
4 |
Total |
|
TIMELINE |
Timeline includes all significant events in the novel, particularly those which directly impacted the development of the team’s assigned subject; presentation is attractive and easy to understand |
Timeline includes most of the significant events in the novel, perhaps excluding some important to the development of the team’s assigned subject; presentation may lack some important visual elements |
Timeline excludes several important events occurring on the island; presentation lacks clarity |
Timeline is inadequate; it fails to adequately represent important events on the island; presentation is sloppy and / or unclear. |
|
|
EVIDENCE |
Assigned number of pieces of evidence is met or exceeded; evidence clearly supports the analysis of the assigned subject; presentation is creative; written description is clear; |
Adequate number of pieces of evidence lacks some elements of support for analysis of the subject; presentation could have been more creative or more clearly explained. |
Limited number of evidence pieces; may not support the analysis being made; presentation is significantly lacking in creativity and / or explanation. |
Evidence is inadequate in number, support for analysis, and presentation. |
|
|
PSYCHOLOGY |
The report effectively explains the behavior of the assigned subject both before the events on the island and after his arrival; report offers recommendation for treatment or insight into the causes of personality change or effects on others. |
The report tries to explain the behavior of the assigned subject either before the events on the island or after his arrival; report may not explain how the subject’s personality altered with or affected the events on the island. |
The report inadequately explains the personality of the subject; report leaves out important elements of subject’s behavior. |
The report does not attempt to explain the behavior of the subject either before his arrival on the island or after his arrival; report is sloppy and poorly researched. |
|
|
TOPOLOGY |
Map creatively and effectively relays important characteristics of the island; labeling clearly indicates traits of the island and locations of significant events. |
Map excludes some important characteristics of the island; presentation may lack clarity or accuracy. |
Map only partially exhibits island characteristics; important island traits or events on the island are not included; presentation lacks clarity. |
Map does not portray island characteristics adequately; presentation is sloppy, making understanding of the events difficult. |
|
|
PRESENTATION |
Effective presentation of evidence supports the team’s analysis of the subject; clear evidence of teamwork; presentation is easily understood both visually and vocally. |
Presentation is somewhat uneven; evidence largely supports the analysis of the subject; visuals and / or vocal presentation could be more effective. |
Presentation is lacking; team participation is obviously very uneven; visuals are lacking; vocal presentation is hard to understand. |
Inadequate presentation; no evidence of teamwork; visuals seem hastily produced; vocal presentation is hard to understand. |
|
|
PROOF |
Team effectively proves that their hypothesis is clearly true or false. All aspects of the project work toward this goal. |
Most items in the project work to prove that the hypothesis is clearly true or false. |
Several aspects of the group project fall short of proving the hypothesis true or false. |
There is little or no effort to prove the team’s hypothesis true or false. |
|