Evaluation
|
|
1 |
2 |
3
|
4 |
Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Organization |
There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts. | Content is logically organized for the most part. | Uses headings or bulleted points to organize, but the overall organization of topics is flawed. | Content is well-organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material. | |
|
Originality |
Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit. | Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking. | Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights. | Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive. | |
|
Content |
Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. | Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors. | Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. | Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. | |
|
Mechanics |
More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar. | Four misspellings and/or grammatical errors. | Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors. | No misspellings or grammatical errors. | |
|
Oral Presentation |
Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost. | Delivery not smooth but able to hold audience attention most of the time. | Relatively interesting, rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention. | Interesting, well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention. |