Evaluation
|
|
Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Accomplished 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pronunciaiton(x2) (oral) | 8+ mispronunciations. | 4-7 mispronunciaitons, | 1-3 mispronunciations, |
no mispronounciations, |
|
|
fluency (x2) (Oral) |
insufficent fluency(pause of more than 2 seconds) | satisfactory fluency (pause(s) of more than 2 seconds) | good fluency (pause (s) of 1 second). | excellent fluency (no pauses). | |
|
vocabulary (both) (x2) |
insufficent use of relevant vocabulary. | satisfactory use of relevant vocabulary. | good use of relevant vocabulary. | excellent use of relevant vocabulary. | |
|
5 commands(both) (x2) |
commands not conjugated or used correctly. | some commands conjugated and used correctly. | most commands conjugated and used correctly | all commands used and conjugated correctly | |
|
overall grammar (x3) (both) |
9+ grammar errors | Description of 5-8 grammar errors | 1-4 grammar errors . | no grammar errors . | |
|
Poster itinerary (x2) |
Trip's itinerary is unclear |
Trip's itinerary is somewhat clear |
Trip's itinerary is clear |
Trip's itinerary is very clear |
|
|
Poster map appearance
|
The poster is messy which makes it difficult to follow |
The poster is somewhat messy, and be followed with some difficulty |
The poster is somewhat well organized and can be followed |
Poster is very well organized, and can be followed without the oral presentation |
|
|
Number of Locations (oral (1)and poster (2)) (x3) |
2 or fewer sites are mentioned and descrbed and/or insufficent deatails were present |
3 sites are mentioned and described with sufficent details |
4 sites are mentioned and described with sufficent details |
5 sites are mentioned and described with excellent details |
|
|
Accents (written) (x2) |
7+ accents incorrectly placed |
4-6 incorrectly placed accents |
1-3 incorrectly placed accents. |
excellent placement of all accents. |
|
|
Credits (x2) |
no credit is given for any of the maps or works cited or is done incorrectly |
3-4 items are missing credit or are done incorrectly |
1-2 items are missing credits or are done incorrectly |
all items are correctly cited |
|
|
Group Work (x2) |
it is clear that the group did not work together because the porject doesn't flow, is disjointed and is a mismash of facts |
this group worked well together on portions of the project as is evident by their cohesion on sections of the oral and map |
this gropu worked well together on most of the map and oral presentation and is obvious based upon their work |
this group worked wonderfully well together and the map and oral reflect a cohesion that all should strive for |
|