Evaluation
|
Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Accomplished 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collaborative Group Work | Needs improvement with working with others. Did not contribute anything to the story. | Did not get along with other group members. Made little or no contribution to the group as a whole. | Worked well, was kind and courteous to group members. Did not give 100% to the group. | Worked well with other group members. Equally contributed to the story. performed their group role well. | |
| Understanding and use of Elements in your sub-genres.
| The story does not have any elements from their genre. | Uses very little elements of the genre in the story. Did not understand what the elements were. | Understood some to most concepts and elements, but did not use all of them. | Understood and used the concepts and elements in the sub-genre to maximum efficiency. | |
|
Originality and creativity of the story
| Story is not original and not acceptable. No clear sign of creative thought. | Original in some regards, but not very creative or imaginative. | Good story, pretty original, but bears slight resemblance to the example. | Story is of superb original work and kept the reader interested. | |
|
Overall Writing (Grammatically and Mechanically)
| Extreme misuse of grammar and the mechanics of the English Language. | Several grammatical errors that interrupted the reading. | Slight grammatical errors, but did not interrupt the reading. |
Almost impeccable grammar. It may be, but |