Evaluation

Beginning

1

Developing

2

Accomplished

3

Exemplary

4

Score

 

Overall Presentation

 

 Little or no group collaboration.  Steps not properly followed in procedure.  Does not present compelling evidence. Some Group Collaboration.  Steps followed, yet shows little research with steps.  Some compelling evidence presented. Group worked well together .  Key events researched.  Well presented, yet some evidence missing.  Group collaborated effectively creating an outstanding presentation.  Thorough research which is backed up by presentation outcome.

 

Research 

 Minimal research.  No resources used. Inaccurate information.  Basic research applied. Only one resource used.  Some Misinterpretation of information. Average research applied.  2-3 sources used.  Information fairly accurate. Above average research.  4 or more sources used.  Information thorough and accurate.

 

Analysis

 

 No independant thought expressed.  Merely retells events. Some analytical thought.  Opinions given, however, not backed up by research. Some analytical thought expressed.  Opinions given are backed up by research.  Highly analytical.  Opinions are well articulated and clearly backed up by research.

 

Creativity 

 Little effort to create a believable courtroom setting.  Shows little interest in presenting material researched. Some attempt to recreate courtroom performance. Shows some effort in presentation with props and costumes. Average attempt to recreate courtroom setting.  Some use of props and costumes. Enthusiastic Courtroom setting.  Exemplary use of props and costumes.

 

Punctuality and Participation 

 Does not interact with group.  Requires others to complete task. Occasionally interacts with group.  Provides minimum amount of individual work in tasks. Interacts well with group. However, only provides average amount of individual work in tasks. Takes on leadership role.  Allows group to flourish.  Offers pleanty of suggestions.  Goes above and beyond in individual work in tasks.

/20